{"id":404012,"date":"2021-03-10T07:00:11","date_gmt":"2021-03-10T05:00:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/?p=404012"},"modified":"2021-03-09T17:51:42","modified_gmt":"2021-03-09T15:51:42","slug":"de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/","title":{"rendered":"De ce a fost clasat dosarul 10 august. \u201eMotivele invocate de fosta \u0219ef\u0103 DIICOT nu au suport\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Motivele invocate de fosta \u015fef\u0103 a DIICOT Giorgiana Hosu \u00een ordonan\u0163a de redeschidere a anchetei \u00eempotriva fo\u015ftilor \u015fefi ai Jandarmeriei \u201enu \u00ee\u015fi g\u0103sesc suportul”, iar argumentele persoanelor v\u0103t\u0103mate nu pot fi analizate \u00een acest cadru procesual, se arat\u0103 \u00een motivarea deciziei Tribunalului Bucure\u015fti privind clasarea dosarului ’10 august’, informeaz\u0103 AGERPRES.<\/strong>
\nTribunalul Bucure\u015fti a dat publicit\u0103\u0163ii, mar\u0163i, motivele pentru care judec\u0103toarea de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 Daria Isabela Mihe\u0163 a respins pe 2 martie cererea DIICOT de redeschidere a anchetei \u00een dosarul ’10 august’.
\n\u00cen motivarea deciziei, care de altfel este foarte tehnic\u0103, judec\u0103toarea arat\u0103 c\u0103 sus\u0163inerile fostei \u015fefe a DIICOT \u00een ordonan\u0163a de redeschidere a urm\u0103ririi penale sunt ne\u00eentemeiate, iar motivele invocate de aceasta vizeaz\u0103 chestiuni de ordin procedural \u015fi nu substan\u0163ial.
\nJudec\u0103toarea explic\u0103 faptul c\u0103, \u00een prezenta cauz\u0103, ancheta penal\u0103 a fost ini\u0163iat\u0103 din oficiu, a doua zi dup\u0103 evenimentele ce au avut loc \u00een data de 10 august 2018, cu ocazia manifesta\u0163iei cunoscute sub denumirea de \u201eMitingul Diasporei”.
\nAstfel, imediat dup\u0103 aceste evenimente, organele de urm\u0103rire penal\u0103 s-au sesizat din oficiu, fiind derulate \u00een paralel dou\u0103 anchete penale: una de c\u0103tre Sec\u0163ia Parchetelor Militare din cadrul Parchetului General \u015fi cealalt\u0103 de c\u0103tre DIICOT. Ulterior, o parte din ancheta desf\u0103\u015furat\u0103 de c\u0103tre Sec\u0163ia Parchetelor Militare a fost declinat\u0103 \u015fi reunit\u0103 la ancheta desf\u0103\u015furat\u0103 de DIICOT.
\nPe de alt\u0103 parte, magistratul spune c\u0103 Sec\u0163ia Parchetelor Militare continu\u0103 investiga\u0163iile penale cu privire la actele de violen\u0163\u0103 ce au avut loc cu ocazia manifesta\u0163iei \u201eMitingul Diasporei”.
\n\u201eRevenind la ancheta penal\u0103 desf\u0103\u015furat\u0103 de DIICOT \u015fi finalizat\u0103 prin ordonan\u0163a nr. 2122\/D\/P\/2019 din data de 26.06.2020, judec\u0103torul de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 constat\u0103 c\u0103 la dispunerea solu\u0163iei procurorul de caz a avut \u00een vedere un amplu probatoriu administrat at\u00e2t de c\u0103tre Sec\u0163ia Parchetelor Militare (probe c\u00e2\u015ftigate cauzei, urmare a prorog\u0103rii de competen\u0163\u0103), c\u00e2t \u015fi de c\u0103tre procurorul DIICOT. Sub acest aspect, judec\u0103torul de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 re\u0163ine caracterul ne\u00eentemeiat al sus\u0163inerilor procurorului ierarhic superior, prin care \u00een\u0163elege s\u0103-\u015fi fundamenteze concluzia deficien\u0163ei anchetei, respectiv c\u0103 procurorul de caz nu a chemat suspec\u0163ii la sediul DIICOT \u00een vederea ascult\u0103rii lor \u00een aceast\u0103 calitate ori c\u0103 nu a citat \u00een vederea reaudierii ori audierii nicio persoan\u0103 v\u0103t\u0103mat\u0103 \u015fi niciun martor (cu excep\u0163ia martorilor Dan Carmen Daniela, Cliseru Speran\u0163a, B\u0103dulescu Aurelian, Mastan Alin Ionel)”, se arat\u0103 \u00een motivarea instan\u0163ei.
\n\u00cen primul r\u00e2nd, spune magistratul, prin prorogarea de competen\u0163\u0103 ce a avut loc prin reunirea cauzei declinate de Sec\u0163ia Parchetelor Militare cu cea aflat\u0103 pe rolul DIICOT, procurorul de caz a avut la dispozi\u0163ie un material probator legal administrat de Sec\u0163ia Parchetelor Militare, pe care l-a procesat \u00een cursul anchetei penale efectuate.
\n\u201e\u00cen al doilea r\u00e2nd, invocarea de c\u0103tre procurorul ierarhic superior (Giorgiana Hosu, n.r.) a faptului c\u0103 procurorul de caz nu a readministrat probatoriul administrat \u00een fa\u0163a Sec\u0163iei Parchetelor Militare, pe l\u00e2ng\u0103 faptul c\u0103 nu exist\u0103 nicio dispozi\u0163ie legal\u0103 care s\u0103 prevad\u0103 aceast\u0103 obliga\u0163ie, este o afirma\u0163ie ‘pro causa’, \u00een condi\u0163iile \u00een care urm\u0103rirea penal\u0103 nu este guvernat\u0103 de principiul nemijlocirii, a\u015fa cum procurorul ierarhic superior a \u00eencercat s\u0103 se sub\u00een\u0163eleag\u0103 (\u00een motivarea ordonan\u0163ei de redeschidere men\u0163ion\u00e2ndu-se c\u0103 ‘trebuie c\u0103utate, \u00een principal, sursele primare ale probelor, organele judiciare trebuie s\u0103 ia leg\u0103tura cu suspectul\/inculpatul \u00een mod direct, s\u0103 asculte nemijlocit martorii, s\u0103 perceap\u0103 direct obiectele ce constituie mijloace materiale de prob\u0103, s\u0103 ia contact cu exper\u0163ii, \u00een acest fel organul judiciar va putea percepe o serie de aspecte care pot influen\u0163a solu\u0163ionarea just\u0103 a cauze’). Principiul nemijlocirii este specific fazei de judecat\u0103 \u015fi reprezint\u0103 o garan\u0163ie a dreptului la un proces echitabil, reglementat de art. 6 din CEDO. Dac\u0103 legiuitorul ar fi \u00een\u0163eles ca urm\u0103rirea penal\u0103 s\u0103 se efectueze \u00een mod nemijlocit de c\u0103tre procuror, institu\u0163ia prev\u0103zut\u0103 de dispozi\u0163iile art. 303 C.pr.pen. – care permite procurorului s\u0103 delege organelor de cercetare penal\u0103 ale poli\u0163iei judiciare efectuarea de acte de urm\u0103rire penal\u0103, acte de urm\u0103rire penal\u0103 care, potrivit art. 7 alin. 6 din OUG 78\/2016 pentru organizarea \u015fi func\u0163ionarea DIICOT, sunt efectuate \u00een numele acestuia – nu ar mai fi fost reglementat\u0103”, se precizeaz\u0103 \u00een motivare.
\nC\u00e2t despre motivul invocat de Giorgiana Hosu c\u0103 suspec\u0163ii, adic\u0103 \u015fefii Jandarmeriei, nu au fost chema\u0163i la sediul DIICOT \u00een vederea audierii, judec\u0103toarea constat\u0103 c\u0103 suspec\u0163ii au fost cita\u0163i \u00een vederea audierii la sediul Sec\u0163iei Parchetelor Militare, pentru a li se aduce la cuno\u015ftin\u0163\u0103 calitatea procesual\u0103, ocazie cu care ace\u015ftia au uzat de dreptul la t\u0103cere.
\n\u201ePrin urmare, c\u00e2t\u0103 vreme procurorul de caz de la DIICOT nu a emis niciun alt act procesual care s\u0103 impun\u0103 obliga\u0163ia acestuia de a chema persoanele anchetate (punerea \u00een mi\u015fcare a ac\u0163iunii penale – art. 309 alin. 2 C.pr.pen; extinderea urm\u0103ririi penale sau schimbarea \u00eencadr\u0103rii – art. 311 alin. 3 C.pr.pen., perchezi\u0163ii domiciliare sau informatice), iar acestea \u015fi-au manifestat dreptul de a nu da declara\u0163ii, sus\u0163inerea procurorului \u015fef nu poate fi primit\u0103 de judec\u0103tor. De\u015fi procurorul ierarhic superior invoc\u0103 o inadverten\u0163\u0103 \u00eentre sus\u0163inerea procurorului de caz – \u00een sensul c\u0103 doar (…) a coordonat ac\u0163iunile desf\u0103\u015furate de c\u0103tre lucr\u0103torii Jandarmeriei (…) care atest\u0103 prezen\u0163a la fa\u0163a locului \u015fi a (…), aceasta este irelevant\u0103, \u00een raport de obiectul proba\u0163iunii \u00eentruc\u00e2t cei doi suspec\u0163i au fost acuza\u0163i c\u0103, prin ordinele date direct for\u0163elor de ordine, f\u0103r\u0103 s\u0103 fi preluat comanda de la (…) , ar fi participat \u00een mod nelegal la conducerea opera\u0163iunilor. Prin urmare, prezen\u0163a lor sau nu la fa\u0163a locului nu prezint\u0103 importan\u0163\u0103 probatorie, de vreme ce probele analizate de procurorul de caz, const\u00e2nd \u00een Jurnalul Ac\u0163iunilor Operative, fluxul de comunica\u0163ii, declara\u0163iile de martor date de lucr\u0103torii jandarmi, au condus pe acesta la concluzia c\u0103 opera\u0163iunile s-au desf\u0103\u015furat f\u0103r\u0103 implicarea (…) \u015fi (…). Pentru acelea\u015fi motive, datele de localizare ale acestora sunt irelevante, sub aspect probator”, precizeaz\u0103 magistratul de la Tribunalul Bucure\u015fti.
\nJudec\u0103toarea consider\u0103 c\u0103 este lipsit de importan\u0163\u0103 \u015fi faptul c\u0103 un num\u0103r limitat de supor\u0163i optici care se presupune c\u0103 ar con\u0163ine film\u0103ri de la acele evenimente au fost deteriora\u0163i \u015fi nu s-au f\u0103cut demersuri pentru ob\u0163inerea datelor con\u0163inute de ace\u015ftia de la sursa ini\u0163ial\u0103, c\u00e2t\u0103 vreme procurorul de caz a avut la dispozi\u0163ie medii de stocare a datelor informatice pe care le-a analizat anterior dispunerii solu\u0163iei de clasare.
\n\u201eContrar celor sus\u0163inute de procurorul ierarhic superior, judec\u0103torul de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 constat\u0103 c\u0103 procurorul de caz a analizat nu doar conduita suspec\u0163ilor pe toat\u0103 durata evenimentelor din data de 10.08.2018, dar \u015fi conduita jandarmilor \u015fi pe cea a protestatarilor, \u00eencep\u00e2nd cu ora 12,00. C\u00e2t despre lipsa de motivare a ordonan\u0163ei de clasare, judec\u0103torul de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 constat\u0103 c\u0103 procurorul ierarhic superior nu argumenteaz\u0103 aceast\u0103 sus\u0163inere, ci se rezum\u0103 doar a invoca principii directoare care se desprind din jurispruden\u0163a CEDO privind obliga\u0163ia motiv\u0103rii actelor procedurale, f\u0103r\u0103 leg\u0103tur\u0103 cu ordonan\u0163a infirmat\u0103. \u00cen opozi\u0163ie cu aceast\u0103 sus\u0163inere, judec\u0103torul de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 constat\u0103 c\u0103 procurorul a respectat obliga\u0163ia de motivare a ordonan\u0163ei de clasare \u015fi a elaborat actul procedural prin indicarea at\u00e2t a \u00eemprejur\u0103rilor de fapt c\u00e2t \u015fi a temeiurilor de drept. Argumentul invocat de procurorul ierarhic superior privind unitatea de anchet\u0103, respectiv ca ancheta penal\u0103 s\u0103 se efectueze de Sec\u0163ia Parchetelor Militare, judec\u0103torul de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 aminte\u015fte c\u0103 \u00eens\u0103\u015fi Sec\u0163ia Parchetelor Militare a dispus declinarea competen\u0163ei de solu\u0163ionare a cauzei cu privire la persoanele \u015fi faptele pentru care \u00eencepuser\u0103 urm\u0103rirea penal\u0103 \u00een favoarea DIICOT, \u00een condi\u0163iile \u00een care efectuase acte de urm\u0103rire penal\u0103 timp de 1 an de la momentul sesiz\u0103rii”, afirm\u0103 instan\u0163a.
\nJudec\u0103toarea precizeaz\u0103 c\u0103, de\u015fi procurorul ierarhic superior a infirmat par\u0163ial ordonan\u0163a de clasare, \u00een procedura intern\u0103, ca urmare a pl\u00e2ngerii formulate de persoanele v\u0103t\u0103mate\/interesate, potrivit art. 339 C.pr.pen., totu\u015fi \u00een ordonan\u0163a de redeschidere a urm\u0103ririi penale nu se analizeaz\u0103 criticile \u00eenvederate de p\u0103r\u0163i cu privire la fondul acuza\u0163iilor \u015fi, „\u00een atare situa\u0163ie, nici judec\u0103torul de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 nu poate analiza, \u00een acest cadru procesual, argumentele persoanelor v\u0103t\u0103mate”.
\n\u201e\u00cen concluzie, fa\u0163\u0103 de considerentele mai sus ar\u0103tate, av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere c\u0103 motivele pe care se sprijin\u0103 ordonan\u0163a procurorului ierarhic superior de redeschidere a urm\u0103ririi penale nu \u00ee\u015fi g\u0103sesc suport \u00een dosarul cauzei, \u00een baza art.335 alin.4 C.pr.pen., judec\u0103torul de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 va respinge cererea de confirmare a redeschiderii urm\u0103ririi penale formulat\u0103 de Parchetul de pe l\u00e2ng\u0103 \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie – Direc\u0163ia de Investigare a Infrac\u0163iunilor de Criminalitate Organizat\u0103 \u015fi Terorism – Structura Central\u0103. \u00cen baza art.335 alin.4 ind. 1 C.pr.pen. va infirma solu\u0163ia de redeschidere a urm\u0103ririi penale dispus\u0103 prin ordonan\u0163a nr.111\/11-2\/2020 din data de 04.08.2020 a procurorului \u015fef al Direc\u0163iei de Investigare a Infrac\u0163iunilor de Criminalitate Organizat\u0103 \u015fi Terorism”, se arat\u0103 \u00een decizia instan\u0163ei.
\nPe 2 martie, Tribunalul Bucure\u015fti a respins solicitarea DIICOT de redeschidere a anchetei \u00eempotriva fo\u015ftilor \u015fefi ai Jandarmeriei \u00een dosarul \u201e10 august”.
\nPractic, prin aceast\u0103 decizie, dosarul a fost clasat, iar fo\u015ftii \u015fefi ai Jandarmeriei nu vor fi urm\u0103ri\u0163i penal pentru interven\u0163ia \u00eempotriva manifestan\u0163ilor la mitingul din Pia\u0163a Victoriei din august 2018.
\nPe 4 august 2020, fostul procuror-\u015fef al DIICOT Giorgiana Hosu a infirmat par\u0163ial solu\u0163ia de clasare a dosarului „10 august” \u015fi a dispus redeschiderea urm\u0103ririi penale \u00een cazul fo\u015ftilor \u015fefi din Jandarmerie: colonelul Gheorghe Sebastian Cuco\u015f, maiorul Lauren\u0163iu Cazan, colonelul C\u0103t\u0103lin Sindile \u015fi comisarul-\u015fef de poli\u0163ie Mihai Dan Chiric\u0103.
\nDecizia trebuia \u00eens\u0103 aprobat\u0103 de un judec\u0103tor, \u00eens\u0103 Tribunalul Bucure\u015fti a respins cererea DIICOT.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Motivele invocate de fosta \u015fef\u0103 a DIICOT Giorgiana Hosu \u00een ordonan\u0163a de redeschidere a anchetei \u00eempotriva fo\u015ftilor \u015fefi ai Jandarmeriei \u201enu \u00ee\u015fi g\u0103sesc suportul”, iar argumentele persoanelor v\u0103t\u0103mate nu pot fi analizate \u00een acest cadru procesual, se arat\u0103 \u00een motivarea deciziei Tribunalului Bucure\u015fti privind clasarea dosarului ’10 august’, informeaz\u0103 AGERPRES. Tribunalul Bucure\u015fti a dat publicit\u0103\u0163ii, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":404013,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"newspack_featured_image_position":"","newspack_post_subtitle":"","newspack_article_summary_title":"Overview:","newspack_article_summary":"","newspack_hide_updated_date":false,"newspack_show_updated_date":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[67],"tags":[9435,9437,9478],"coauthors":[],"yoast_head":"\nDe ce a fost clasat dosarul 10 august. \u201eMotivele invocate de fosta \u0219ef\u0103 DIICOT nu au suport\u201d • Ora de Medias<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ro_RO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"De ce a fost clasat dosarul 10 august. \u201eMotivele invocate de fosta \u0219ef\u0103 DIICOT nu au suport\u201d • Ora de Medias\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Motivele invocate de fosta \u015fef\u0103 a DIICOT Giorgiana Hosu \u00een ordonan\u0163a de redeschidere a anchetei \u00eempotriva fo\u015ftilor \u015fefi ai Jandarmeriei \u201enu \u00ee\u015fi g\u0103sesc suportul”, iar argumentele persoanelor v\u0103t\u0103mate nu pot fi analizate \u00een acest cadru procesual, se arat\u0103 \u00een motivarea deciziei Tribunalului Bucure\u015fti privind clasarea dosarului ’10 august’, informeaz\u0103 AGERPRES. Tribunalul Bucure\u015fti a dat publicit\u0103\u0163ii, […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ora de Medias\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/orademedias\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-03-10T05:00:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-03-09T15:51:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/orademedias.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/10-august-1.jpg?fit=1500%2C1000&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ora de Media\u0219\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Scris de\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ora de Media\u0219\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Timp estimat pentru citire\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minute\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label3\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data3\" content=\"Ora de Media\u0219\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Ora de Media\u0219\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/#\/schema\/person\/24d8592f55ef503c4a88a59ffabf6d62\"},\"headline\":\"De ce a fost clasat dosarul 10 august. \u201eMotivele invocate de fosta \u0219ef\u0103 DIICOT nu au suport\u201d\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-03-10T05:00:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-03-09T15:51:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/\"},\"wordCount\":1753,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orademedias.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/10-august-1.jpg?fit=1500%2C1000&ssl=1\",\"keywords\":[\"10 august\",\"clasare dosar\",\"motivatie\"],\"articleSection\":[\"ROM\u00c2NIA\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/\",\"name\":\"De ce a fost clasat dosarul 10 august. \u201eMotivele invocate de fosta \u0219ef\u0103 DIICOT nu au suport\u201d • Ora de Medias\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orademedias.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/10-august-1.jpg?fit=1500%2C1000&ssl=1\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-03-10T05:00:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-03-09T15:51:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orademedias.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/10-august-1.jpg?fit=1500%2C1000&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orademedias.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/10-august-1.jpg?fit=1500%2C1000&ssl=1\",\"width\":1500,\"height\":1000},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Prima pagin\u0103\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"De ce a fost clasat dosarul 10 august. \u201eMotivele invocate de fosta \u0219ef\u0103 DIICOT nu au suport\u201d\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/\",\"name\":\"Ora de Medias\",\"description\":\"Ultimele \u0219tiri locale\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Ora de Media\u0219\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/cropped-cropped-logo-medias-3.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/cropped-cropped-logo-medias-3.png\",\"width\":200,\"height\":79,\"caption\":\"Ora de Media\u0219\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/orademedias\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/#\/schema\/person\/24d8592f55ef503c4a88a59ffabf6d62\",\"name\":\"Ora de Media\u0219\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/bb50bec026ebf1dd410939ee55a02d96\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/868acb8f8e5885ec7d75fb36f52c59bf?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/868acb8f8e5885ec7d75fb36f52c59bf?s=96&d=blank&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ora de Media\u0219\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/author\/odm\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"De ce a fost clasat dosarul 10 august. \u201eMotivele invocate de fosta \u0219ef\u0103 DIICOT nu au suport\u201d • Ora de Medias","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/","og_locale":"ro_RO","og_type":"article","og_title":"De ce a fost clasat dosarul 10 august. \u201eMotivele invocate de fosta \u0219ef\u0103 DIICOT nu au suport\u201d • Ora de Medias","og_description":"Motivele invocate de fosta \u015fef\u0103 a DIICOT Giorgiana Hosu \u00een ordonan\u0163a de redeschidere a anchetei \u00eempotriva fo\u015ftilor \u015fefi ai Jandarmeriei \u201enu \u00ee\u015fi g\u0103sesc suportul”, iar argumentele persoanelor v\u0103t\u0103mate nu pot fi analizate \u00een acest cadru procesual, se arat\u0103 \u00een motivarea deciziei Tribunalului Bucure\u015fti privind clasarea dosarului ’10 august’, informeaz\u0103 AGERPRES. Tribunalul Bucure\u015fti a dat publicit\u0103\u0163ii, […]","og_url":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/","og_site_name":"Ora de Medias","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/orademedias","article_published_time":"2021-03-10T05:00:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-03-09T15:51:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1500,"height":1000,"url":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/orademedias.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/10-august-1.jpg?fit=1500%2C1000&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ora de Media\u0219","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Scris de":"Ora de Media\u0219","Timp estimat pentru citire":"7 minute","Written by":"Ora de Media\u0219"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/"},"author":{"name":"Ora de Media\u0219","@id":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/#\/schema\/person\/24d8592f55ef503c4a88a59ffabf6d62"},"headline":"De ce a fost clasat dosarul 10 august. \u201eMotivele invocate de fosta \u0219ef\u0103 DIICOT nu au suport\u201d","datePublished":"2021-03-10T05:00:11+00:00","dateModified":"2021-03-09T15:51:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/"},"wordCount":1753,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orademedias.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/10-august-1.jpg?fit=1500%2C1000&ssl=1","keywords":["10 august","clasare dosar","motivatie"],"articleSection":["ROM\u00c2NIA"],"inLanguage":"ro-RO","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/","url":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/","name":"De ce a fost clasat dosarul 10 august. \u201eMotivele invocate de fosta \u0219ef\u0103 DIICOT nu au suport\u201d • Ora de Medias","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orademedias.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/10-august-1.jpg?fit=1500%2C1000&ssl=1","datePublished":"2021-03-10T05:00:11+00:00","dateModified":"2021-03-09T15:51:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ro-RO","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ro-RO","@id":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orademedias.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/10-august-1.jpg?fit=1500%2C1000&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orademedias.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/10-august-1.jpg?fit=1500%2C1000&ssl=1","width":1500,"height":1000},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/de-ce-a-fost-clasat-dosarul-10-august-motivele-invocate-de-fosta-sefa-diicot-nu-au-suport\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Prima pagin\u0103","item":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"De ce a fost clasat dosarul 10 august. \u201eMotivele invocate de fosta \u0219ef\u0103 DIICOT nu au suport\u201d"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/#website","url":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/","name":"Ora de Medias","description":"Ultimele \u0219tiri locale","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"ro-RO"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/#organization","name":"Ora de Media\u0219","url":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ro-RO","@id":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/cropped-cropped-logo-medias-3.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/cropped-cropped-logo-medias-3.png","width":200,"height":79,"caption":"Ora de Media\u0219"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/orademedias"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/#\/schema\/person\/24d8592f55ef503c4a88a59ffabf6d62","name":"Ora de Media\u0219","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ro-RO","@id":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/bb50bec026ebf1dd410939ee55a02d96","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/868acb8f8e5885ec7d75fb36f52c59bf?s=96&d=blank&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/868acb8f8e5885ec7d75fb36f52c59bf?s=96&d=blank&r=g","caption":"Ora de Media\u0219"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/"],"url":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/author\/odm\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orademedias.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/10-august-1.jpg?fit=1500%2C1000&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Ora de Medias","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro","push-errors":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/404012"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=404012"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/404012\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/404013"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=404012"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=404012"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=404012"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orademedias.ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=404012"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}